Good Jobs America : Making Work Better for Everyone

نویسنده

  • CARRIE M. LANE
چکیده

Debates in which moral imperatives run up against finite economic resources and the pragmatics of policy-making are rarely productive. Each side arrives armed with studies and statistics to support their own position—this thing must be done at all costs; this thing costs too much to do; this thing cannot realistically be done—and each usually departs with those same beliefs intact. To move beyond this impasse requires careful analysis of the assumptions and evidence, in all their varied forms, each group brings to the table. With their book Good Jobs America, Paul Osterman and Beth Shulman hope to do just that for discussions around lowwage work. They make a smart and complex case that creating good jobs does not necessarily entail sacrificing other worthwhile goals such as low prices, a healthy economy, and global competitiveness, and that when tradeoffs are necessary, the benefits ultimately outweigh the costs. (Although Osterman and Shulman conceptualized the book together, Shulman unfortunately passed away before the writing began.) The book’s greatest contribution is its clear elucidation of the myths shaping most debates and policies around low-wage work (jobs paying below poverty wage or less than two-thirds of the median wage). Following an informative and wide-ranging first chapter on the state of low-wage work in America today, the authors spend Chapter Two debunking misconceptions around lowwage work: (1) low-wage jobs are temporary positions people move through as they progress up the career ladder; (2) most bad jobs disappear when the economy improves; (3) the low-wage labor market is populated by immigrants who push down wages; (4) better jobs lead to unmotivated workers who produce less; and (5) policies around lowwage work are ineffective if not detrimental. One by one, each contention is briefly disputed by an assortment of statistics, case studies, and international comparisons. For example, the authors note that the United States lags behind comparable countries in intergenerational mobility, and few adult low-wage workers ever escape into better-paid positions. Charts demonstrate that the percentage of low-wage positions remained relatively constant throughout the boom-and-bust 1990s, disproving the claim that a strong economy necessarily leads to better jobs. The link between immigration and lowwage work is challenged by evidence that increased immigration has not pushed down wages in any significant way, and even during periods of high immigration native workers hold the majority of lowwage jobs. To dispute the notion that raising wages decrease productivity, the United States is measured against European countries with much smaller fractions of low-wage jobs which nonetheless remain competitive in international markets. Finally, minimum wage laws, which contrary to predictions do not result in fewer jobs overall, are offered as examples of effective policy-making. Subsequent chapters continue the work of myth-busting. An especially strong chapter challenges the claim that better education and improved skills alone can prevent workers from falling into low-wage jobs. Another focuses on how employers themselves think about low-wage work, providing heartening evidence that most employers want to offer better jobs but are discouraged from doing so by a combination of fear, misinformation, and lack of managerial resources. Peppered throughout this chapter, and the rest of the book, are examples of firms that have managed, through a combination of dedication and innovation, to provide high-quality jobs in sectors dominated by low-wage work (e.g., healthcare, hotels, and manufacturing). These success stories offer tangible, tested strategies for turning bad jobs into good by providing fair wages, skills training, and opportunities for advancement without compromising— and sometimes even enhancing—profitability and competitiveness. Chapter Five laments the current system of inadequate and rarely-enforced employment standards, advocating for stronger regulations to be enforced by a coalition of 410 Reviews

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Diagnosing Expertise: Human Capital, Decision Making, and Performance among Physicians.

Expert performance is often evaluated assuming that good experts have good outcomes. We examine expertise in medicine and develop a model that allows for two dimensions of physician performance: decision making and procedural skill. Better procedural skill increases the use of intensive procedures for everyone, while better decision making results in a reallocation of procedures from fewer low-...

متن کامل

The limitations of employment as a tool for social inclusion

BACKGROUND One important component of social inclusion is the improvement of well-being through encouraging participation in employment and work life. However, the ways that employment contributes to wellbeing are complex. This study investigates how poor health status might act as a barrier to gaining good quality work, and how good quality work is an important pre-requisite for positive healt...

متن کامل

Diabetes, hyperglycemia and its role in fitness for work

Diabetes, hyperglycemia and its role in fitness for work   Introduction: Diabetes is a prevalent disease in our country and in the world. Hyperglycemia complications can impact on ability to work. Decision making about fitness for work in diabetic patients is important and complicated. Objective: The aim of this study was assessment scientific evidence and present suitable approach for fit...

متن کامل

Benefits of Speedup Knowledge in Memory-Constrained Multiprocessor Scheduling

Recently, research on scheduling for large-scale multiprocessor systems has begun to take into consideration the memory sizes of jobs. The approach used to ensure good performance without considering memory is to increase the multiprogramming level as the load increases. But if jobs require signiicant amounts of memory, then there will be a point at which the system can no longer t additional j...

متن کامل

How do people differentiate between jobs: and how do they define a good job?

Employed individuals from a range of jobs (n=18) were interviewed using a repertory grid technique, to explore the criteria they used to distinguish between different jobs. The concepts of 'a good job' and 'a job good for health' were also discussed. Interactions with others and the job itself were the most commonly used criteria and were also the most common features of a 'good job'. Pay and s...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2013